Journal article
Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences
AH Tyner, AL Abatayo, M Daley, S Field, N Fox, NA Haber, KM Hahn, MK Struhl, B Mawhinney, O Miske, P Silverstein, CK Soderberg, T Stankov, A Abbasi, CL Aberson, B Aczel, M Adamkovič, N Albayrak, PJ Allen, M Andreychik Show all
Nature | Published : 2026
Abstract
Pursuing replicability — independent evidence for previous claims — is important for creating generalizable knowledge1,2. Here we attempted replications of 274 claims of positive results from 164 quantitative papers published from 2009 to 2018 in 54 journals in the social and behavioural sciences. Replications were high powered on average to detect the original effect size (median of 99.6%), used original materials when relevant and available, and were peer reviewed in advance through a standardized internal protocol. Replications showed statistically significant results in the original pattern for 151 of 274 claims (55.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49.2–60.9%)) and for 80.8 of 164 papers..
View full abstractGrants
Awarded by U.S. Department of Defense