Journal article

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences

AH Tyner, AL Abatayo, M Daley, S Field, N Fox, NA Haber, KM Hahn, MK Struhl, B Mawhinney, O Miske, P Silverstein, CK Soderberg, T Stankov, A Abbasi, CL Aberson, B Aczel, M Adamkovič, N Albayrak, PJ Allen, M Andreychik Show all

Nature | Published : 2026

Abstract

Pursuing replicability — independent evidence for previous claims — is important for creating generalizable knowledge1,2. Here we attempted replications of 274 claims of positive results from 164 quantitative papers published from 2009 to 2018 in 54 journals in the social and behavioural sciences. Replications were high powered on average to detect the original effect size (median of 99.6%), used original materials when relevant and available, and were peer reviewed in advance through a standardized internal protocol. Replications showed statistically significant results in the original pattern for 151 of 274 claims (55.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49.2–60.9%)) and for 80.8 of 164 papers..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Grants

Awarded by U.S. Department of Defense